Streaming deals were once seen as the ultimate win, global distribution, upfront revenue, and prestige. But the landscape is shifting. With oversaturation, shrinking payouts, and hidden costs, indie filmmakers are realizing that streaming licenses alone won’t sustain a project, or a career.
Streaming Doesn’t Mean Visibility
Despite the sheer volume of content being licensed to platforms like Netflix and Amazon, discoverability has become a major challenge. As Vanity Fair aptly observed in “The Film Snob’s Dilemma,” vast libraries may seem infinite, but they often bury niche, quality indie work under algorithmic noise. Meanwhile, thousands of indie titles compete for attention on each platform, leading to derailing discoverability and low engagement.

Deals Are Devalued
The negotiations and payouts for indie films have declined sharply. Reddit users in r/Filmmakers report Netflix deals growing increasingly stingy, minimal guarantees, fees depleting in legal terms, and contracts stacked against creators. even typically requiring distributors to take a 20% cut for little effort.
Platform Economics Aren’t Sustainable
Major streaming services are bleeding money. Deloitte highlights that while they control half of their revenue from theatrical, most platforms are unprofitable and increasingly cautious about independent content. The market consolidation among a few major players, with 80% of viewing time dominated by six tech giants, further squeezes indie visibility.

Hidden Costs Deplete Margins
A recent FilmLocal report highlights that 90% of indie films rely on streaming but rarely recover costs. True indie licensing deals often hover in the $1K to $10K range. Filmmakers may need to allocate 20%-plus of their budgets just to market on top of that, eroding profit even further.
Global Sales Aren’t What They Used to Be
Traditional foreign sales packaged by sales agents once offered a cash lifeline. But those markets are contracting too, under pressure from global streaming pricing structures. Export revenues are diminishing, leaving fewer territories willing to buy indie content outright.

The Rise of Alternative Models
To survive, creators are diversifying beyond platform licensing.
Curated and niche platforms | Like MUBI, Criterion Channel, and indie-friendly BVOD services (Vimeo On Demand), offer better curation, higher transparency, and stronger revenue share. |
Direct-to-fan sales | Via websites, Patreon, or digital storefronts, let filmmakers retain control, build community, and often generate higher margins. |
Hybrid distribution approaches | Bundled festival premieres, targeted SFOD/VOD, theatrical on-demand, and educational or institutional licensing. |
Independent Filmmakers Are Leading the Charge
Film Threat highlighted how filmmakers are strategically avoiding Netflix and similar platforms, choosing instead to cultivate micro-audiences through platforms that respect ownership, data transparency, and meaningful engagement. That includes linking digital releases to mailing lists, offering merch, and delivering exclusive extras.
Add your film to Garvescope’s film marketplace and get instant access to a global network of film investors, sponsors, and buyers.
Garvescope also offers world-class, personalized business and marketing services for filmmakers and indie film and TV projects. Learn more
Our Final Take
The streaming boom is collapsing into a bubble, flooded, opaque, and unreliable for indies. Licensing deals alone are no longer enough. What filmmakers need is a diversified strategy: niche platforms, direct sales, and audience-first distribution. That’s how you safeguard revenue, visibility, and sustainability in an increasingly competitive market.
Leave a Reply